Thursday, March 1, 2012

Modern Arch Since 1900 Ch14

the ideal community: alternatives to the industrial city

A big concern of modern architects was not to design one building but to design a whole city. Particularly the holistic design would pay attention to working class buildings which many architects and city planners felt were being ignored.

Some wanted to break up a city into manageable sizes and include lots of green spaces. There were also plans to turn the city grid into a linear shape.

One big problem was the living spaces for the working class. Some wanted one large building to house workers. It would promote a communal space but it was doomed to be repetitious.

In the end, the ability to build a city from scratch didn't materialize and much of theories were left unpracticed.

Modern Arch Since 1900 Ch13

skyscrapper and suburb: the u.s.a. between the wars

The Chicago Tribune competition raised question of what a 'beautiful' modern building would be. There wasn't a consensus and left many architects scratching their heads. This illustrates the larger picture that although modern architecture was dipping it's toes in the water, there wasn't a library of forms to choose from. Much of what was an appropriate look needed to be invented.

Skyscrapers appeared in the early 20th century in the economic boom following the great depression. Their size was intimidating especially at a time where they weren't surrounded by other skyscrapers. Their forms suggested nihilistic temples to capitalism. Their form seemed to be subservient to regional vernaculars or sensibilities of the European avant-guard.

Wright's architecture also was analogous with the times. Instead of making forms that would identify as an archetypal house, he began building from his own fascination with ancient temples and such. In a way celebrating aristocratic power in a time where wealth was being concentrated to a small amount of people.